[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+CK2bAkimTmsj-iGVq6AkMMNAb7+J5wm-Ra-qovS+3Ou5j33w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2019 15:00:05 -0400
From: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>
To: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
kexec mailing list <kexec@...ts.infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, will@...nel.org,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@....com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Bhupesh Sharma <bhsharma@...hat.com>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/17] arm64, trans_pgd: add trans_pgd_create_empty
On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 11:20 AM James Morse <james.morse@....com> wrote:
>
> Hi Pavel,
>
> On 21/08/2019 19:31, Pavel Tatashin wrote:
> > This functions returns a zeroed trans_pgd using the allocator that is
> > specified in the info argument.
> >
> > trans_pgds should be created by using this function.
>
> This function takes the allocator you give it, and calls it once.
>
> Given both users need one pgd, and have to provide the allocator, it seems strange that
> they aren't trusted to call it.
>
> I don't think this patch is necessary.
>
> Let the caller pass in the pgd_t to the helpers.
Ok.
Thank you,
Pasha
Powered by blists - more mailing lists