linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Fixed parentheses malpractice in apex

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <C3F8799B-2CFE-4F3B-A01A-DFDF248BA01F@volery.com>
Date:   Sat, 7 Sep 2019 16:48:21 +0200
From:   Sandro Volery <sandro@...ery.com>
To:     Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc:     rspringer@...gle.com, toddpoynor@...gle.com, benchan@...omium.org,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fixed parentheses malpractice in apex_driver.c



> On 7 Sep 2019, at 16:39, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com> wrote:
> 
> You need a subject prefix.  It should be something like:
> 
> [PATCH] Staging: gasket: Fix parentheses malpractice in apex_driver.c
> 

Thanks for the reply! I'll try to do that better for my next patch.

> Generally "Fix" is considered better style than "Fixed".  We aren't
> going to care about that in staging, but the patch prefix is mandatory
> so you will need to redo it anyway and might as well fix that as well.
> 
>> On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 08:38:01PM +0200, volery wrote:
>> There were some parentheses at the end of lines, which I took care of.
>> This is my first patch.
>  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Put this sort of comments after the --- cut off line
> 
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Sandro Volery <sandro@...ery.com>
>> ---
>  ^^^
> Put it here.  It will be removed when we apply the patch so it won't
> be recorded in the git log.
> 

Alright :)

>> drivers/staging/gasket/apex_driver.c | 9 ++++++---
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> Joe's comments are, of course, correct as well.
> 
> regards,
> dan carpenter
> 

I'll take a look at Joe's suggestions too sometime tonight. I'd feel kinda bad tho if I just apply his work and send it in?

- Sandro Volery