[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190907173910.GA9547@SD>
Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2019 23:09:10 +0530
From: Saiyam Doshi <saiyamdoshi.in@...il.com>
To: linus.walleij@...aro.org, bgolaszewski@...libre.com
Cc: linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] gpio: remove explicit comparison with 0
No need to compare return value with 0. In case of non-zero
return value, the if condition will be true.
This makes intent a bit more clear to the reader.
"if (x) then", compared to "if (x is not zero) then".
Signed-off-by: Saiyam Doshi <saiyamdoshi.in@...il.com>
---
drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
index edc1ea68db20..847cb0c522d0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
@@ -851,7 +851,7 @@ static irqreturn_t lineevent_irq_thread(int irq, void *p)
}
ret = kfifo_put(&le->events, ge);
- if (ret != 0)
+ if (ret)
wake_up_poll(&le->wait, EPOLLIN);
return IRQ_HANDLED;
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists