lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53e58345-f2dc-8fa3-22b7-cf4ee1308043@web.de>
Date:   Sat, 7 Sep 2019 10:05:06 +0200
From:   Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To:     Denis Efremov <efremov@...ux.com>,
        Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>, cocci@...teme.lip6.fr
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@...6.fr>,
        Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@...g.fr>,
        Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
        Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
        Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
Subject: Re: [v2] scripts: coccinelle: check for !(un)?likely usage

> I think I will resend this patch as a part of patchset with all warnings fixed
> in a couple of days. Hope this will help to create a discussion point with other
> developers about readability of "!likely" and "!unlikely".

Will the influence of code variations become more interesting also for
the discussed SmPL script?

Regards,
Markus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ