[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190908121150.585264776@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2019 13:41:01 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 5.2 05/94] net: stmmac: dwmac-rk: Dont fail if phy regulator is absent
From: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
[ Upstream commit 3b25528e1e355c803e73aa326ce657b5606cda73 ]
The devicetree binding lists the phy phy as optional. As such, the
driver should not bail out if it can't find a regulator. Instead it
should just skip the remaining regulator related code and continue
on normally.
Skip the remainder of phy_power_on() if a regulator supply isn't
available. This also gets rid of the bogus return code.
Fixes: 2e12f536635f ("net: stmmac: dwmac-rk: Use standard devicetree property for phy regulator")
Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-rk.c | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-rk.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-rk.c
@@ -1194,10 +1194,8 @@ static int phy_power_on(struct rk_priv_d
int ret;
struct device *dev = &bsp_priv->pdev->dev;
- if (!ldo) {
- dev_err(dev, "no regulator found\n");
- return -1;
- }
+ if (!ldo)
+ return 0;
if (enable) {
ret = regulator_enable(ldo);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists