[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190908193149.GD7664@valentin-vidic.from.hr>
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2019 19:31:49 +0000
From: Valentin Vidić <vvidic@...entin-vidic.from.hr>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
Valdis Kletnieks <valdis.kletnieks@...edu>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] staging: exfat: drop duplicate date_time_t struct
On Sun, Sep 08, 2019 at 07:54:24PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 08, 2019 at 05:35:37PM +0000, Valentin Vidic wrote:
> > +struct timestamp_t {
> > + u16 millisec; /* 0 ~ 999 */
>
> You added this field to this structure, why? You did not document that
> in the changelog text above. Are you _sure_ you can do this and that
> this does not refer to an on-disk layout?
Both date_time_t and timestamp_t were used in memory only, but
date_time_t had the additional MilliSecond field. To keep the
functionality I added the millisec field to timestamp_t and
replaced all usages of date_time_t with timestamp_t.
For storing on disk the values from timestamp_t get shifted
and combined (exfat_set_entry_time).
--
Valentin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists