[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1567937945.w0h0w8qaz6.astroid@bobo.none>
Date: Sun, 08 Sep 2019 20:25:05 +1000
From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] powerpc/ftrace: Enable
HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_RET_ADDR_PTR
Naveen N. Rao's on September 6, 2019 4:20 am:
> Enable HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_RET_ADDR_PTR for more robust stack unwinding
> when function graph tracer is in use. Convert powerpc show_stack() to
> use ftrace_graph_ret_addr() for better stack unwinding.
This series improved my case of a WARN_ON triggering in
trace_graph_return, the last return_to_handler entry in the stack
dump has the caller in parenthesis rather than return_to_handler.
It gives the caller, it would be nice if it could output the actual
function being traced, and then continue the caller. But at least
this is a significant improvement. Thanks for the quick turnaround.
Tested-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists