[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2019 20:26:05 -0500
From: Sreeram Veluthakkal <srrmvlt@...il.com>
To: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc: nishadkamdar@...il.com, jeremy@...zel.net,
thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com,
payal.s.kshirsagar.98@...il.com, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sreeram Veluthakkal <srrmvlt@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] FBTFT: fb_agm1264k: usleep_range is preferred over udelay
This patch fixes the issue:
FILE: drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_agm1264k-fl.c:88:
CHECK: usleep_range is preferred over udelay; see Documentation/timers/timers-howto.rst
+ udelay(20);
Signed-off-by: Sreeram Veluthakkal <srrmvlt@...il.com>
---
drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_agm1264k-fl.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_agm1264k-fl.c b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_agm1264k-fl.c
index eeeeec97ad27..2dece71fd3b5 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_agm1264k-fl.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fb_agm1264k-fl.c
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ static void reset(struct fbtft_par *par)
dev_dbg(par->info->device, "%s()\n", __func__);
gpiod_set_value(par->gpio.reset, 0);
- udelay(20);
+ usleep_range(20, 40);
gpiod_set_value(par->gpio.reset, 1);
mdelay(120);
}
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists