linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/5] clk: qcom: apcs-msm8916: get parent clock names from DT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 09 Sep 2019 03:21:16 -0700
From:   Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To:     agross@...nel.org, jorge.ramirez-ortiz@...aro.org,
        mturquette@...libre.com
Cc:     bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, niklas.cassel@...aro.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] clk: qcom: apcs-msm8916: get parent clock names from DT

Quoting Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz (2019-08-26 09:45:07)
> @@ -76,10 +88,11 @@ static int qcom_apcs_msm8916_clk_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>         a53cc->src_shift = 8;
>         a53cc->parent_map = gpll0_a53cc_map;
>  
> -       a53cc->pclk = devm_clk_get(parent, NULL);
> +       a53cc->pclk = of_clk_get(parent->of_node, pll_index);

Presumably the PLL was always index 0, so why are we changing it to
index 1 sometimes? Seems unnecessary.