lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 9 Sep 2019 13:00:36 +0200
From:   Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:     Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...hip.com>,
        Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
        Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@...dex.ru>, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/4] Fix: sched/membarrier: p->mm->membarrier_state
 racy load (v2)

On 09/08, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>
> +static void sync_runqueues_membarrier_state(struct mm_struct *mm)
> +{
> +	int membarrier_state = atomic_read(&mm->membarrier_state);
> +	bool fallback = false;
> +	cpumask_var_t tmpmask;
> +	int cpu;
> +
> +	if (atomic_read(&mm->mm_users) == 1 || num_online_cpus() == 1) {
> +		WRITE_ONCE(this_rq()->membarrier_state, membarrier_state);

This doesn't look safe, this caller can migrate to another CPU after
it calculates the per-cpu ptr.

I think you need do disable preemption or simply use this_cpu_write().

Oleg.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ