linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] Revert and rework on the metadata accelreation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190909081537-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 9 Sep 2019 08:15:52 -0400
From:   "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To:     Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, jgg@...lanox.com,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        aarcange@...hat.com, jglisse@...hat.com, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Revert and rework on the metadata accelreation

On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 03:18:01PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> 
> On 2019/9/6 下午9:15, David Miller wrote:
> > From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
> > Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2019 18:02:35 +0800
> > 
> > > On 2019/9/5 下午9:59, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > > I think you should apply the revert this cycle and rebase the other
> > > > patch for next..
> > > > 
> > > > Jason
> > > Yes, the plan is to revert in this release cycle.
> > Then you should reset patch #1 all by itself targetting 'net'.
> 
> 
> Thanks for the reminding. I want the patch to go through Michael's vhost
> tree, that's why I don't put 'net' prefix. For next time, maybe I can use
> "vhost" as a prefix for classification?

That's fine by me.

-- 
MST