| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <DB7PR04MB51958FC2BBE82BE503ACFDB0E2B60@DB7PR04MB5195.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 08:01:36 +0000
From: Wen He <wen.he_1@....com>
To: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@....com>
CC: "linux-devel@...ux.nxdi.nxp.com" <linux-devel@...ux.nxdi.nxp.com>,
Brian Starkey <brian.starkey@....com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Leo Li <leoyang.li@....com>
Subject: RE: [EXT] Re: [v4 2/2] drm/arm/mali-dp: Add display QoS interface
configuration for Mali DP500
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@....com>
> Sent: 2019年9月6日 22:18
> To: Wen He <wen.he_1@....com>
> Cc: linux-devel@...ux.nxdi.nxp.com; Brian Starkey <brian.starkey@....com>;
> David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>; Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>; Rob Herring
> <robh+dt@...nel.org>; Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>;
> dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org; devicetree@...r.kernel.org;
> linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Leo Li <leoyang.li@....com>
> Subject: [EXT] Re: [v4 2/2] drm/arm/mali-dp: Add display QoS interface
> configuration for Mali DP500
>
> Caution: EXT Email
>
> Hi Wen,
>
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 10:11:35AM +0800, Wen He wrote:
> > Configure the display Quality of service (QoS) levels priority if the
> > optional property node "arm,malidp-aqros-value" is defined in DTS file.
> >
> > QoS signaling using AQROS and AWQOS AXI interface signals, the AQROS
> > is driven from the "RQOS" register, so needed to program the RQOS
> > register to avoid the high resolutions flicker issue on the LS1028A platform.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wen He <wen.he_1@....com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/arm/malidp_drv.c | 6 ++++++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/arm/malidp_hw.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/arm/malidp_hw.h | 3 +++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/arm/malidp_regs.h | 10 ++++++++++
> > 4 files changed, 32 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/malidp_drv.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/malidp_drv.c
> > index c27ff456eddc..80e8d15760ac 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/malidp_drv.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/malidp_drv.c
> > @@ -815,6 +815,12 @@ static int malidp_bind(struct device *dev)
> >
> > malidp->core_id = version;
> >
> > + ret = of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node,
> > + "arm,malidp-arqos-value",
> > + &hwdev->arqos_value);
> > + if (ret)
> > + hwdev->arqos_value = 0x0;
> > +
> > /* set the number of lines used for output of RGB data */
> > ret = of_property_read_u8_array(dev->of_node,
> > "arm,malidp-output-port-lines",
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/malidp_hw.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/malidp_hw.c index 380be66d4c6e..f90a367a5bc9
> > 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/malidp_hw.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/malidp_hw.c
> > @@ -374,6 +374,19 @@ static void malidp500_modeset(struct
> malidp_hw_device *hwdev, struct videomode *
> > malidp_hw_setbits(hwdev, MALIDP_DISP_FUNC_ILACED,
> MALIDP_DE_DISPLAY_FUNC);
> > else
> > malidp_hw_clearbits(hwdev, MALIDP_DISP_FUNC_ILACED,
> > MALIDP_DE_DISPLAY_FUNC);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Program the RQoS register to avoid high resolutions flicker
> > + * issue on the LS1028A.
> > + */
> > + if (hwdev->arqos_value) {
> > + val = hwdev->arqos_value;
> > +
> > + if (mode->pixelclock > 148500000)
> > + malidp_hw_setbits(hwdev, val,
> MALIDP500_RQOS_QUALITY);
> > + else
> > + malidp_hw_clearbits(hwdev, val,
> MALIDP500_RQOS_QUALITY);
> > + }
>
> This application of the arqos_value based on a pixel clock value bothers me,
> because it has two problems:
>
> 1. Some other user of the Mali DP driver can't apply a system QoS value that
> they can now specify in the DT, unless the requested pixel clock is bigger than
> 145MHz. :(
>
> 2. (A guess) The flickering issue shows up on a combination of pixelclock and
> resolution (i.e. it is a bandwidth problem), but you only address one of the
> variables. Haven't tested on the LS1028A yet, but do you know if (theoretically)
> it would have a flicker problem doing 640x480@...MHz without the QoS
> value?
>
> How about this instead?
>
> --8<---------------------------------------------------------------------
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/malidp_hw.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/malidp_hw.c index 380be66d4c6eb..e2f96dce13850
> 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/malidp_hw.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/malidp_hw.c
> @@ -374,6 +374,22 @@ static void malidp500_modeset(struct
> malidp_hw_device *hwdev, struct videomode *
> malidp_hw_setbits(hwdev, MALIDP_DISP_FUNC_ILACED,
> MALIDP_DE_DISPLAY_FUNC);
> else
> malidp_hw_clearbits(hwdev, MALIDP_DISP_FUNC_ILACED,
> MALIDP_DE_DISPLAY_FUNC);
> +
> + /*
> + * Program the RQoS register. LS1028A has an issue where screen
> will
> + * flicker on pixelclocks higher than 148.5MHz but otherwise doesn't
> + * want an RQoS value, so special case it for them.
> + */
> + if (hwdev->arqos_value) {
> + val = hwdev->arqos_value;
> +
> +#ifdef MALIDP_LS1028A
> + if (mode->pixelclock <= 148500000)
> + malidp_hw_clearbits(hwdev, val,
> MALIDP500_RQOS_QUALITY);
> + else
> +#endif
> + malidp_hw_setbits(hwdev, val,
> MALIDP500_RQOS_QUALITY);
> + }
> }
>
> int malidp_format_get_bpp(u32 fmt)
> --8<---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> And then you need to define a MALIDP_LS1028A in a vendor patch on top of
> the kernel source code.
That's a good instead, thanks a lot.
After discussed with our team, they think should not put the different on the vendor code, benchmark results
can accept the small reduce, so here should always apply this change.
I will send next version that remove the condition of the pixel clock , thanks a lot.
Best Regards,
Wen
>
> Best regards,
> Liviu
>
>
> > }
> >
> > int malidp_format_get_bpp(u32 fmt)
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/malidp_hw.h
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/malidp_hw.h index 968a65eed371..e4c36bc90bda
> > 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/malidp_hw.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/malidp_hw.h
> > @@ -251,6 +251,9 @@ struct malidp_hw_device {
> >
> > /* size of memory used for rotating layers, up to two banks available
> */
> > u32 rotation_memory[2];
> > +
> > + /* priority level of RQOS register used for driven the ARQOS signal */
> > + u32 arqos_value;
> > };
> >
> > static inline u32 malidp_hw_read(struct malidp_hw_device *hwdev, u32
> > reg) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/malidp_regs.h
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/malidp_regs.h
> > index 993031542fa1..514c50dcb74d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/malidp_regs.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/malidp_regs.h
> > @@ -210,6 +210,16 @@
> > #define MALIDP500_CONFIG_VALID 0x00f00
> > #define MALIDP500_CONFIG_ID 0x00fd4
> >
> > +/*
> > + * The quality of service (QoS) register on the DP500. RQOS register
> > +values
> > + * are driven by the ARQOS signal, using AXI transacations, dependent
> > +on the
> > + * FIFO input level.
> > + * The RQOS register can also set QoS levels for:
> > + * - RED_ARQOS @ A 4-bit signal value for close to underflow
> conditions
> > + * - GREEN_ARQOS @ A 4-bit signal value for normal conditions
> > + */
> > +#define MALIDP500_RQOS_QUALITY 0x00500
> > +
> > /* register offsets and bits specific to DP550/DP650 */
> > #define MALIDP550_ADDR_SPACE_SIZE 0x10000
> > #define MALIDP550_DE_CONTROL 0x00010
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >
>
> --
> ====================
> | I would like to |
> | fix the world, |
> | but they're not |
> | giving me the |
> \ source code! /
> ---------------
> ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Powered by blists - more mailing lists