[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190910101502.2ioujfvopyr5krpq@box.shutemov.name>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 13:15:02 +0300
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
To: Alastair D'Silva <alastair@....ibm.com>
Cc: alastair@...ilva.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>,
Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, Qian Cai <cai@....pw>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] memory_hotplug: Add a bounds check to
check_hotplug_memory_range()
On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 12:52:20PM +1000, Alastair D'Silva wrote:
> From: Alastair D'Silva <alastair@...ilva.org>
>
> On PowerPC, the address ranges allocated to OpenCAPI LPC memory
> are allocated from firmware. These address ranges may be higher
> than what older kernels permit, as we increased the maximum
> permissable address in commit 4ffe713b7587
> ("powerpc/mm: Increase the max addressable memory to 2PB"). It is
> possible that the addressable range may change again in the
> future.
>
> In this scenario, we end up with a bogus section returned from
> __section_nr (see the discussion on the thread "mm: Trigger bug on
> if a section is not found in __section_nr").
>
> Adding a check here means that we fail early and have an
> opportunity to handle the error gracefully, rather than rumbling
> on and potentially accessing an incorrect section.
>
> Further discussion is also on the thread ("powerpc: Perform a bounds
> check in arch_add_memory").
>
> Signed-off-by: Alastair D'Silva <alastair@...ilva.org>
> ---
> include/linux/memory_hotplug.h | 1 +
> mm/memory_hotplug.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h b/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h
> index f46ea71b4ffd..bc477e98a310 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h
> @@ -110,6 +110,7 @@ extern void __online_page_increment_counters(struct page *page);
> extern void __online_page_free(struct page *page);
>
> extern int try_online_node(int nid);
> +int check_hotplug_memory_addressable(u64 start, u64 size);
>
> extern int arch_add_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size,
> struct mhp_restrictions *restrictions);
> diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> index c73f09913165..3c5428b014f9 100644
> --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> @@ -1030,6 +1030,23 @@ int try_online_node(int nid)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +#ifndef MAX_POSSIBLE_PHYSMEM_BITS
> +#ifdef MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS
> +#define MAX_POSSIBLE_PHYSMEM_BITS MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS
> +#endif
> +#endif
> +
> +int check_hotplug_memory_addressable(u64 start, u64 size)
> +{
> +#ifdef MAX_POSSIBLE_PHYSMEM_BITS
How can it be not defined? You've defined it 6 lines above.
> + if ((start + size - 1) >> MAX_POSSIBLE_PHYSMEM_BITS)
> + return -E2BIG;
> +#endif
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(check_hotplug_memory_addressable);
> +
> static int check_hotplug_memory_range(u64 start, u64 size)
> {
> /* memory range must be block size aligned */
> @@ -1040,7 +1057,7 @@ static int check_hotplug_memory_range(u64 start, u64 size)
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - return 0;
> + return check_hotplug_memory_addressable(start, size);
> }
>
> static int online_memory_block(struct memory_block *mem, void *arg)
> --
> 2.21.0
>
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists