[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <30545c5c-ff4c-8b87-e591-40cc0a631304@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 13:21:16 +0200
From: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
To: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>
Cc: mtk.manpages@...il.com,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
linux-man <linux-man@...r.kernel.org>,
Containers <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Jordan Ogas <jogas@...l.gov>, werner@...esberger.net,
Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: pivot_root(".", ".") and the fchdir() dance
Hello Christian,
>> All: I plan to add the following text to the manual page:
>>
>> new_root and put_old may be the same directory. In particular,
>> the following sequence allows a pivot-root operation without need‐
>> ing to create and remove a temporary directory:
>>
>> chdir(new_root);
>> pivot_root(".", ".");
>> umount2(".", MNT_DETACH);
>
> Hm, should we mention that MS_PRIVATE or MS_SLAVE is usually needed
> before the umount2()? Especially for the container case... I think we
> discussed this briefly yesterday in person.
Thanks for noticing. That detail (more precisely: not MS_SHARED) is
already covered in the numerous other changes that I have pending
for this page:
The following restrictions apply:
...
- The propagation type of new_root and its parent mount must not
be MS_SHARED; similarly, if put_old is an existing mount point,
its propagation type must not be MS_SHARED.
Thanks,
Michael
--
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists