| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <2fd8940b-9ebd-d143-5ce6-c056750c596f@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 20:04:05 +0800
From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
To: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: avoid infinite GC loop due to stale
atomic files
On 2019/9/10 19:58, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 09/10, Chao Yu wrote:
>> On 2019/9/9 22:34, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>> On 09/09, Chao Yu wrote:
>>>> On 2019/9/9 16:38, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>>>> On 09/09, Chao Yu wrote:
>>>>>> On 2019/9/9 16:21, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>>>>>> On 09/09, Chao Yu wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2019/9/9 16:01, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 09/09, Chao Yu wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 2019/9/9 15:30, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 09/09, Chao Yu wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2019/9/9 9:25, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> If committing atomic pages is failed when doing f2fs_do_sync_file(), we can
>>>>>>>>>>>>> get commited pages but atomic_file being still set like:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> - inmem: 0, atomic IO: 4 (Max. 10), volatile IO: 0 (Max. 0)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> If GC selects this block, we can get an infinite loop like this:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> f2fs_submit_page_bio: dev = (253,7), ino = 2, page_index = 0x2359a8, oldaddr = 0x2359a8, newaddr = 0x2359a8, rw = READ(), type = COLD_DATA
>>>>>>>>>>>>> f2fs_submit_read_bio: dev = (253,7)/(253,7), rw = READ(), DATA, sector = 18533696, size = 4096
>>>>>>>>>>>>> f2fs_get_victim: dev = (253,7), type = No TYPE, policy = (Foreground GC, LFS-mode, Greedy), victim = 4355, cost = 1, ofs_unit = 1, pre_victim_secno = 4355, prefree = 0, free = 234
>>>>>>>>>>>>> f2fs_iget: dev = (253,7), ino = 6247, pino = 5845, i_mode = 0x81b0, i_size = 319488, i_nlink = 1, i_blocks = 624, i_advise = 0x2c
>>>>>>>>>>>>> f2fs_submit_page_bio: dev = (253,7), ino = 2, page_index = 0x2359a8, oldaddr = 0x2359a8, newaddr = 0x2359a8, rw = READ(), type = COLD_DATA
>>>>>>>>>>>>> f2fs_submit_read_bio: dev = (253,7)/(253,7), rw = READ(), DATA, sector = 18533696, size = 4096
>>>>>>>>>>>>> f2fs_get_victim: dev = (253,7), type = No TYPE, policy = (Foreground GC, LFS-mode, Greedy), victim = 4355, cost = 1, ofs_unit = 1, pre_victim_secno = 4355, prefree = 0, free = 234
>>>>>>>>>>>>> f2fs_iget: dev = (253,7), ino = 6247, pino = 5845, i_mode = 0x81b0, i_size = 319488, i_nlink = 1, i_blocks = 624, i_advise = 0x2c
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In that moment, we can observe:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [Before]
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Try to move 5084219 blocks (BG: 384508)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> - data blocks : 4962373 (274483)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> - node blocks : 121846 (110025)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Skipped : atomic write 4534686 (10)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [After]
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Try to move 5088973 blocks (BG: 384508)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> - data blocks : 4967127 (274483)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> - node blocks : 121846 (110025)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Skipped : atomic write 4539440 (10)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>>>>> fs/f2fs/file.c | 10 +++++-----
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c
>>>>>>>>>>>>> index 7ae2f3bd8c2f..68b6da734e5f 100644
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/file.c
>>>>>>>>>>>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c
>>>>>>>>>>>>> @@ -1997,11 +1997,11 @@ static int f2fs_ioc_commit_atomic_write(struct file *filp)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> goto err_out;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ret = f2fs_do_sync_file(filp, 0, LLONG_MAX, 0, true);
>>>>>>>>>>>>> - if (!ret) {
>>>>>>>>>>>>> - clear_inode_flag(inode, FI_ATOMIC_FILE);
>>>>>>>>>>>>> - F2FS_I(inode)->i_gc_failures[GC_FAILURE_ATOMIC] = 0;
>>>>>>>>>>>>> - stat_dec_atomic_write(inode);
>>>>>>>>>>>>> - }
>>>>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>>>>> + /* doesn't need to check error */
>>>>>>>>>>>>> + clear_inode_flag(inode, FI_ATOMIC_FILE);
>>>>>>>>>>>>> + F2FS_I(inode)->i_gc_failures[GC_FAILURE_ATOMIC] = 0;
>>>>>>>>>>>>> + stat_dec_atomic_write(inode);
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> If there are still valid atomic write pages linked in .inmem_pages, it may cause
>>>>>>>>>>>> memory leak when we just clear FI_ATOMIC_FILE flag.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> f2fs_commit_inmem_pages() should have flushed them.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Oh, we failed to flush its nodes.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> However we won't clear such info if we failed to flush inmen pages, it looks
>>>>>>>>>> inconsistent.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Any interface needed to drop inmem pages or clear ATOMIC_FILE flag in that two
>>>>>>>>>> error path? I'm not very clear how sqlite handle such error.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> f2fs_drop_inmem_pages() did that, but not in this case.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What I mean is, for any error returned from atomic_commit() interface, should
>>>>>>>> userspace application handle it with consistent way, like trigger
>>>>>>>> f2fs_drop_inmem_pages(), so we don't need to handle it inside atomic_commit().
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> f2fs_ioc_abort_volatile_write() will be triggered.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If userspace can do this, we can get rid of this patch, or am I missing sth?
>>>>>
>>>>> We don't know when that will come. And, other threads are waiting for GC here.
>>>>
>>>> Yes, however, even atomic_write won't be called sometimes... that's why we add
>>>> handling logic in f2fs_gc().
>>>
>>> We need to clean this up like:
>>>
>>> If committing atomic pages is failed when doing f2fs_do_sync_file(), we can
>>> get commited pages but atomic_file being still set like:
>>>
>>> - inmem: 0, atomic IO: 4 (Max. 10), volatile IO: 0 (Max. 0)
>>>
>>> If GC selects this block, we can get an infinite loop like this:
>>>
>>> f2fs_submit_page_bio: dev = (253,7), ino = 2, page_index = 0x2359a8, oldaddr = 0x2359a8, newaddr = 0x2359a8, rw = READ(), type = COLD_DATA
>>> f2fs_submit_read_bio: dev = (253,7)/(253,7), rw = READ(), DATA, sector = 18533696, size = 4096
>>> f2fs_get_victim: dev = (253,7), type = No TYPE, policy = (Foreground GC, LFS-mode, Greedy), victim = 4355, cost = 1, ofs_unit = 1, pre_victim_secno = 4355, prefree = 0, free = 234
>>> f2fs_iget: dev = (253,7), ino = 6247, pino = 5845, i_mode = 0x81b0, i_size = 319488, i_nlink = 1, i_blocks = 624, i_advise = 0x2c
>>> f2fs_submit_page_bio: dev = (253,7), ino = 2, page_index = 0x2359a8, oldaddr = 0x2359a8, newaddr = 0x2359a8, rw = READ(), type = COLD_DATA
>>> f2fs_submit_read_bio: dev = (253,7)/(253,7), rw = READ(), DATA, sector = 18533696, size = 4096
>>> f2fs_get_victim: dev = (253,7), type = No TYPE, policy = (Foreground GC, LFS-mode, Greedy), victim = 4355, cost = 1, ofs_unit = 1, pre_victim_secno = 4355, prefree = 0, free = 234
>>> f2fs_iget: dev = (253,7), ino = 6247, pino = 5845, i_mode = 0x81b0, i_size = 319488, i_nlink = 1, i_blocks = 624, i_advise = 0x2c
>>>
>>> In that moment, we can observe:
>>>
>>> [Before]
>>> Try to move 5084219 blocks (BG: 384508)
>>> - data blocks : 4962373 (274483)
>>> - node blocks : 121846 (110025)
>>> Skipped : atomic write 4534686 (10)
>>>
>>> [After]
>>> Try to move 5088973 blocks (BG: 384508)
>>> - data blocks : 4967127 (274483)
>>> - node blocks : 121846 (110025)
>>> Skipped : atomic write 4539440 (10)
>>>
>>> So, refactor atomic_write flow like this:
>>> 1. start_atomic_write
>>> - add inmem_list and set atomic_file
>>>
>>> 2. write()
>>> - register it in inmem_pages
>>>
>>> 3. commit_atomic_write
>>> - if no error, f2fs_drop_inmem_pages()
>>> - f2fs_commit_inmme_pages() failed
>>> : __revoked_inmem_pages() was done
>>> - f2fs_do_sync_file failed
>>> : abort_atomic_write later
>>>
>>> 4. abort_atomic_write
>>> - f2fs_drop_inmem_pages
>>>
>>> 5. f2fs_drop_inmem_pages
>>> - clear atomic_file
>>> - remove inmem_list
>>
>> Looks good.
>>
>>>
>>> Based on this change, when GC fails to move block in atomic_file,
>>> f2fs_drop_inmem_pages_all() can call f2fs_drop_inmem_pages().
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
>>> ---
>>> fs/f2fs/file.c | 17 +++++++++++------
>>> fs/f2fs/segment.c | 24 +++++-------------------
>>> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c
>>> index 10927a0b8df3..1f499ac13d9a 100644
>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/file.c
>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c
>>> @@ -1830,6 +1830,7 @@ static int f2fs_ioc_start_atomic_write(struct file *filp)
>>> {
>>> struct inode *inode = file_inode(filp);
>>> int ret;
>>> + struct f2fs_inode_info *fi = F2FS_I(inode);
>>>
>>> if (!inode_owner_or_capable(inode))
>>> return -EACCES;
>>> @@ -1871,10 +1872,17 @@ static int f2fs_ioc_start_atomic_write(struct file *filp)
>>> goto out;
>>> }
>>>
>>> - set_inode_flag(inode, FI_ATOMIC_FILE);
>>> clear_inode_flag(inode, FI_ATOMIC_REVOKE_REQUEST);
>>> up_write(&F2FS_I(inode)->i_gc_rwsem[WRITE]);
>>>
>>> + spin_lock(&sbi->inode_lock[ATOMIC_FILE]);
>>> + if (list_empty(&fi->inmem_ilist))
>>> + list_add_tail(&fi->inmem_ilist, &sbi->inode_list[ATOMIC_FILE]);
>>> + spin_unlock(&sbi->inode_lock[ATOMIC_FILE]);
>>> +
>>> + /* add inode in inmem_list first and set atomic_file */
>>> + set_inode_flag(inode, FI_ATOMIC_FILE);
>>
>> Should call up_write(&F2FS_I(inode)->i_gc_rwsem[WRITE]) here? Then in f2fs_gc(),
>> we can check FI_ATOMIC_FILE atomically under i_gc_rwsem.
>
> Yup.
>
> If committing atomic pages is failed when doing f2fs_do_sync_file(), we can
> get commited pages but atomic_file being still set like:
>
> - inmem: 0, atomic IO: 4 (Max. 10), volatile IO: 0 (Max. 0)
>
> If GC selects this block, we can get an infinite loop like this:
>
> f2fs_submit_page_bio: dev = (253,7), ino = 2, page_index = 0x2359a8, oldaddr = 0x2359a8, newaddr = 0x2359a8, rw = READ(), type = COLD_DATA
> f2fs_submit_read_bio: dev = (253,7)/(253,7), rw = READ(), DATA, sector = 18533696, size = 4096
> f2fs_get_victim: dev = (253,7), type = No TYPE, policy = (Foreground GC, LFS-mode, Greedy), victim = 4355, cost = 1, ofs_unit = 1, pre_victim_secno = 4355, prefree = 0, free = 234
> f2fs_iget: dev = (253,7), ino = 6247, pino = 5845, i_mode = 0x81b0, i_size = 319488, i_nlink = 1, i_blocks = 624, i_advise = 0x2c
> f2fs_submit_page_bio: dev = (253,7), ino = 2, page_index = 0x2359a8, oldaddr = 0x2359a8, newaddr = 0x2359a8, rw = READ(), type = COLD_DATA
> f2fs_submit_read_bio: dev = (253,7)/(253,7), rw = READ(), DATA, sector = 18533696, size = 4096
> f2fs_get_victim: dev = (253,7), type = No TYPE, policy = (Foreground GC, LFS-mode, Greedy), victim = 4355, cost = 1, ofs_unit = 1, pre_victim_secno = 4355, prefree = 0, free = 234
> f2fs_iget: dev = (253,7), ino = 6247, pino = 5845, i_mode = 0x81b0, i_size = 319488, i_nlink = 1, i_blocks = 624, i_advise = 0x2c
>
> In that moment, we can observe:
>
> [Before]
> Try to move 5084219 blocks (BG: 384508)
> - data blocks : 4962373 (274483)
> - node blocks : 121846 (110025)
> Skipped : atomic write 4534686 (10)
>
> [After]
> Try to move 5088973 blocks (BG: 384508)
> - data blocks : 4967127 (274483)
> - node blocks : 121846 (110025)
> Skipped : atomic write 4539440 (10)
>
> So, refactor atomic_write flow like this:
> 1. start_atomic_write
> - add inmem_list and set atomic_file
>
> 2. write()
> - register it in inmem_pages
>
> 3. commit_atomic_write
> - if no error, f2fs_drop_inmem_pages()
> - f2fs_commit_inmme_pages() failed
> : __revoked_inmem_pages() was done
> - f2fs_do_sync_file failed
> : abort_atomic_write later
>
> 4. abort_atomic_write
> - f2fs_drop_inmem_pages
>
> 5. f2fs_drop_inmem_pages
> - clear atomic_file
> - remove inmem_list
>
> Based on this change, when GC fails to move block in atomic_file,
> f2fs_drop_inmem_pages_all() can call f2fs_drop_inmem_pages().
>
> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/file.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
> fs/f2fs/segment.c | 27 ++++++---------------------
> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c
> index 10927a0b8df3..fab6e4cf8f06 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/file.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c
> @@ -1829,6 +1829,8 @@ static int f2fs_ioc_getversion(struct file *filp, unsigned long arg)
> static int f2fs_ioc_start_atomic_write(struct file *filp)
> {
> struct inode *inode = file_inode(filp);
> + struct f2fs_inode_info *fi = F2FS_I(inode);
> + struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_I_SB(inode);
> int ret;
>
> if (!inode_owner_or_capable(inode))
> @@ -1871,6 +1873,12 @@ static int f2fs_ioc_start_atomic_write(struct file *filp)
> goto out;
> }
>
> + spin_lock(&sbi->inode_lock[ATOMIC_FILE]);
> + if (list_empty(&fi->inmem_ilist))
> + list_add_tail(&fi->inmem_ilist, &sbi->inode_list[ATOMIC_FILE]);
> + spin_unlock(&sbi->inode_lock[ATOMIC_FILE]);
> +
> + /* add inode in inmem_list first and set atomic_file */
> set_inode_flag(inode, FI_ATOMIC_FILE);
> clear_inode_flag(inode, FI_ATOMIC_REVOKE_REQUEST);
> up_write(&F2FS_I(inode)->i_gc_rwsem[WRITE]);
> @@ -1912,11 +1920,8 @@ static int f2fs_ioc_commit_atomic_write(struct file *filp)
> goto err_out;
>
> ret = f2fs_do_sync_file(filp, 0, LLONG_MAX, 0, true);
> - if (!ret) {
> - clear_inode_flag(inode, FI_ATOMIC_FILE);
> - F2FS_I(inode)->i_gc_failures[GC_FAILURE_ATOMIC] = 0;
> - stat_dec_atomic_write(inode);
> - }
> + if (!ret)
> + f2fs_drop_inmem_pages(inode);
> } else {
> ret = f2fs_do_sync_file(filp, 0, LLONG_MAX, 1, false);
> }
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> index 18584d4c078a..66343f451d73 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> @@ -185,8 +185,6 @@ bool f2fs_need_SSR(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>
> void f2fs_register_inmem_page(struct inode *inode, struct page *page)
> {
> - struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_I_SB(inode);
> - struct f2fs_inode_info *fi = F2FS_I(inode);
> struct inmem_pages *new;
>
> f2fs_trace_pid(page);
> @@ -200,15 +198,9 @@ void f2fs_register_inmem_page(struct inode *inode, struct page *page)
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&new->list);
>
> /* increase reference count with clean state */
> - mutex_lock(&fi->inmem_lock);
The lock is used to protect F2FS_I(inode)->inmem_pages list... it should be kept?
Thanks,
> get_page(page);
> - list_add_tail(&new->list, &fi->inmem_pages);
> - spin_lock(&sbi->inode_lock[ATOMIC_FILE]);
> - if (list_empty(&fi->inmem_ilist))
> - list_add_tail(&fi->inmem_ilist, &sbi->inode_list[ATOMIC_FILE]);
> - spin_unlock(&sbi->inode_lock[ATOMIC_FILE]);
> + list_add_tail(&new->list, &F2FS_I(inode)->inmem_pages);
> inc_page_count(F2FS_I_SB(inode), F2FS_INMEM_PAGES);
> - mutex_unlock(&fi->inmem_lock);
>
> trace_f2fs_register_inmem_page(page, INMEM);
> }
> @@ -330,19 +322,17 @@ void f2fs_drop_inmem_pages(struct inode *inode)
> mutex_lock(&fi->inmem_lock);
> __revoke_inmem_pages(inode, &fi->inmem_pages,
> true, false, true);
> -
> - if (list_empty(&fi->inmem_pages)) {
> - spin_lock(&sbi->inode_lock[ATOMIC_FILE]);
> - if (!list_empty(&fi->inmem_ilist))
> - list_del_init(&fi->inmem_ilist);
> - spin_unlock(&sbi->inode_lock[ATOMIC_FILE]);
> - }
> mutex_unlock(&fi->inmem_lock);
> }
>
> clear_inode_flag(inode, FI_ATOMIC_FILE);
> fi->i_gc_failures[GC_FAILURE_ATOMIC] = 0;
> stat_dec_atomic_write(inode);
> +
> + spin_lock(&sbi->inode_lock[ATOMIC_FILE]);
> + if (!list_empty(&fi->inmem_ilist))
> + list_del_init(&fi->inmem_ilist);
> + spin_unlock(&sbi->inode_lock[ATOMIC_FILE]);
> }
>
> void f2fs_drop_inmem_page(struct inode *inode, struct page *page)
> @@ -471,11 +461,6 @@ int f2fs_commit_inmem_pages(struct inode *inode)
>
> mutex_lock(&fi->inmem_lock);
> err = __f2fs_commit_inmem_pages(inode);
> -
> - spin_lock(&sbi->inode_lock[ATOMIC_FILE]);
> - if (!list_empty(&fi->inmem_ilist))
> - list_del_init(&fi->inmem_ilist);
> - spin_unlock(&sbi->inode_lock[ATOMIC_FILE]);
> mutex_unlock(&fi->inmem_lock);
>
> clear_inode_flag(inode, FI_ATOMIC_COMMIT);
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists