[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190910123657.GE23931@zn.tnic>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 14:36:57 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Tony W Wang-oc <TonyWWang-oc@...oxin.com>
Cc: "tony.luck@...el.com" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"yazen.ghannam@....com" <yazen.ghannam@....com>,
"vishal.l.verma@...el.com" <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
"qiuxu.zhuo@...el.com" <qiuxu.zhuo@...el.com>,
David Wang <DavidWang@...oxin.com>,
"Cooper Yan(BJ-RD)" <CooperYan@...oxin.com>,
"Qiyuan Wang(BJ-RD)" <QiyuanWang@...oxin.com>,
"Herry Yang(BJ-RD)" <HerryYang@...oxin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] x86/mce: Add Zhaoxin LMCE support
On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 08:20:07AM +0000, Tony W Wang-oc wrote:
> Zhaoxin newer CPUs support LMCE that compatible with Intel's
> "Machine-Check Architecture", so add support for Zhaoxin LMCE
> in mce/core.c.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tony W Wang-oc <TonyWWang-oc@...oxin.com>
> ---
> v1->v2:
> - Fix redefinition of "mce_zhaoxin_feature_clear"
>
> arch/x86/include/asm/mce.h | 2 ++
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/mce.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/mce.h
> index 0986a11..01840ec 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/mce.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mce.h
> @@ -352,8 +352,10 @@ static inline void mce_hygon_feature_init(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) { return mce_am
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_SUP_ZHAOXIN
> void mce_zhaoxin_feature_init(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c);
> +void mce_zhaoxin_feature_clear(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c);
> #else
> static inline void mce_zhaoxin_feature_init(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) { }
> +static inline void mce_zhaoxin_feature_clear(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) { }
> #endif
>
> #endif /* _ASM_X86_MCE_H */
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c
> index 8a36833..595d3af7ac 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c
> @@ -1129,6 +1129,17 @@ static bool __mc_check_crashing_cpu(int cpu)
> u64 mcgstatus;
>
> mcgstatus = mce_rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_MCG_STATUS);
> +
> + if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_ZHAOXIN) {
> + if (mcgstatus & MCG_STATUS_LMCES) {
> + return false;
> + } else {
> + if (mcgstatus & MCG_STATUS_RIPV)
> + mce_wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_MCG_STATUS, 0);
> + return true;
> + }
> + }
Simplify:
if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_ZHAOXIN) {
if (mcgstatus & MCG_STATUS_LMCES)
return false;
}
<--- Now here, on your CPUs which don't set MCG_STATUS_LMCES,
it will fallback to clearing the status register. I.e., what you do in the else
clause.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists