lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <61a2b2ab4693535850306f396aac2a328e1d5a21.camel@perches.com>
Date:   Tue, 10 Sep 2019 10:18:44 -0700
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        rafael@...nel.org,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
        Tzvetomir Stoyanov <tstoyanov@...are.com>,
        linux-trace-devel@...r.kernel.org, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 01/12] tools lib traceevent: Convert remaining %p[fF]
 users to %p[sS]

On Tue, 2019-09-10 at 07:18 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Sep 2019 11:46:56 +0300
> Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > There are no in-kernel %p[fF] users left. Convert the traceevent tool,
> > too, to align with the kernel.
[]
> > diff --git a/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c b/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c
[]
> > @@ -4335,8 +4335,6 @@ static struct tep_print_arg *make_bprint_args(char *fmt, void *data, int size, s
> >  					switch (*ptr) {
> >  					case 's':
> >  					case 'S':
> > -					case 'f':
> > -					case 'F':
> 
> This file is used to parse output from older kernels, so remove this hunk.
> 
> It's not just for the lastest kernel. We must maintain backward
> compatibility here too. If there use to be a usage of this, then we
> must keep it until the kernels are no longer used (perhaps 7 years?)

That argues for not using "%pfw" at all for some number of years.

Perhaps the '%pfw' should be '%pnfw' for 'name' and 'fwnode'



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ