| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 16:31:46 -0700
From: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>
To: mike.kravetz@...cle.com
Cc: shuah@...nel.org, almasrymina@...gle.com, rientjes@...gle.com,
shakeelb@...gle.com, gthelen@...gle.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
khalid.aziz@...cle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
mkoutny@...e.com, Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 9/9] hugetlb_cgroup: Add hugetlb_cgroup reservation docs
Add docs for how to use hugetlb_cgroup reservations, and their behavior.
Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>
Acked-by: Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>
---
.../admin-guide/cgroup-v1/hugetlb.rst | 84 ++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 73 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v1/hugetlb.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v1/hugetlb.rst
index a3902aa253a96..cc6eb859fc722 100644
--- a/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v1/hugetlb.rst
+++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v1/hugetlb.rst
@@ -2,13 +2,6 @@
HugeTLB Controller
==================
-The HugeTLB controller allows to limit the HugeTLB usage per control group and
-enforces the controller limit during page fault. Since HugeTLB doesn't
-support page reclaim, enforcing the limit at page fault time implies that,
-the application will get SIGBUS signal if it tries to access HugeTLB pages
-beyond its limit. This requires the application to know beforehand how much
-HugeTLB pages it would require for its use.
-
HugeTLB controller can be created by first mounting the cgroup filesystem.
# mount -t cgroup -o hugetlb none /sys/fs/cgroup
@@ -28,10 +21,14 @@ process (bash) into it.
Brief summary of control files::
- hugetlb.<hugepagesize>.limit_in_bytes # set/show limit of "hugepagesize" hugetlb usage
- hugetlb.<hugepagesize>.max_usage_in_bytes # show max "hugepagesize" hugetlb usage recorded
- hugetlb.<hugepagesize>.usage_in_bytes # show current usage for "hugepagesize" hugetlb
- hugetlb.<hugepagesize>.failcnt # show the number of allocation failure due to HugeTLB limit
+ hugetlb.<hugepagesize>.reservation_limit_in_bytes # set/show limit of "hugepagesize" hugetlb reservations
+ hugetlb.<hugepagesize>.reservation_max_usage_in_bytes # show max "hugepagesize" hugetlb reservations recorded
+ hugetlb.<hugepagesize>.reservation_usage_in_bytes # show current reservations for "hugepagesize" hugetlb
+ hugetlb.<hugepagesize>.reservation_failcnt # show the number of allocation failure due to HugeTLB reservation limit
+ hugetlb.<hugepagesize>.limit_in_bytes # set/show limit of "hugepagesize" hugetlb faults
+ hugetlb.<hugepagesize>.max_usage_in_bytes # show max "hugepagesize" hugetlb usage recorded
+ hugetlb.<hugepagesize>.usage_in_bytes # show current usage for "hugepagesize" hugetlb
+ hugetlb.<hugepagesize>.failcnt # show the number of allocation failure due to HugeTLB usage limit
For a system supporting three hugepage sizes (64k, 32M and 1G), the control
files include::
@@ -40,11 +37,76 @@ files include::
hugetlb.1GB.max_usage_in_bytes
hugetlb.1GB.usage_in_bytes
hugetlb.1GB.failcnt
+ hugetlb.1GB.reservation_limit_in_bytes
+ hugetlb.1GB.reservation_max_usage_in_bytes
+ hugetlb.1GB.reservation_usage_in_bytes
+ hugetlb.1GB.reservation_failcnt
hugetlb.64KB.limit_in_bytes
hugetlb.64KB.max_usage_in_bytes
hugetlb.64KB.usage_in_bytes
hugetlb.64KB.failcnt
+ hugetlb.64KB.reservation_limit_in_bytes
+ hugetlb.64KB.reservation_max_usage_in_bytes
+ hugetlb.64KB.reservation_usage_in_bytes
+ hugetlb.64KB.reservation_failcnt
hugetlb.32MB.limit_in_bytes
hugetlb.32MB.max_usage_in_bytes
hugetlb.32MB.usage_in_bytes
hugetlb.32MB.failcnt
+ hugetlb.32MB.reservation_limit_in_bytes
+ hugetlb.32MB.reservation_max_usage_in_bytes
+ hugetlb.32MB.reservation_usage_in_bytes
+ hugetlb.32MB.reservation_failcnt
+
+
+1. Reservation limits
+
+The HugeTLB controller allows to limit the HugeTLB reservations per control
+group and enforces the controller limit at reservation time. Reservation limits
+are superior to Page fault limits (see section 2), since Reservation limits are
+enforced at reservation time, and never causes the application to get SIGBUS
+signal. Instead, if the application is violating its limits, then it gets an
+error on reservation time, i.e. the mmap or shmget return an error.
+
+
+2. Page fault limits
+
+The HugeTLB controller allows to limit the HugeTLB usage (page fault) per
+control group and enforces the controller limit during page fault. Since HugeTLB
+doesn't support page reclaim, enforcing the limit at page fault time implies
+that, the application will get SIGBUS signal if it tries to access HugeTLB
+pages beyond its limit. This requires the application to know beforehand how
+much HugeTLB pages it would require for its use.
+
+
+3. Caveats with shared memory
+
+a. Charging and uncharging:
+
+For shared hugetlb memory, both hugetlb reservation and usage (page faults) are
+charged to the first task that causes the memory to be reserved or faulted,
+and all subsequent uses of this reserved or faulted memory is done without
+charging.
+
+Shared hugetlb memory is only uncharged when it is unreseved or deallocated.
+This is usually when the hugetlbfs file is deleted, and not when the task that
+caused the reservation or fault has exited.
+
+b. Interaction between reservation limit and fault limit.
+
+Generally, it's not recommended to set both of the reservation limit and fault
+limit in a cgroup. For private memory, the fault usage cannot exceed the
+reservation usage, so if you set both, one of those limits will be useless.
+
+For shared memory, a cgroup's fault usage may be greater than its reservation
+usage, so some care needs to be taken. Consider this example:
+
+- Task A reserves 4 pages in a shared hugetlbfs file. Cgroup A will get
+ 4 reservations charged to it and no faults charged to it.
+- Task B reserves and faults the same 4 pages as Task A. Cgroup B will get no
+ reservation charge, but will get charged 4 faulted pages. If Cgroup B's limit
+ is less than 4, then Task B will get a SIGBUS.
+
+For the above scenario, it's not recommended for the userspace to set both
+reservation limits and fault limits, but it is still allowed to in case it sees
+some use for it.
--
2.23.0.162.g0b9fbb3734-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists