[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Ve5NvhzOQ96OgbPh1LdsAtvk+A=aVu-oXKdhnB4PpL_og@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 11:29:10 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 06/14] software node: get rid of property_set_pointer()
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 8:15 AM Dmitry Torokhov
<dmitry.torokhov@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Instead of explicitly setting values of integer types when copying
> property entries lets just copy entire value union when processing
> non-array values.
>
> When handling array values assign the pointer there using the newly
> introduced "raw" pointer union member. This allows us to remove
> property_set_pointer().
>
> In property_get_pointer() we do not need to handle each data type
> separately, we can simply return either the raw pointer or pointer to
> values union.
Same as before, typechecking is good thing to have for my point of view.
Others may have different opinions.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists