linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: imx8mm: Remove incorrect fallback compatible for ocotp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 11 Sep 2019 11:01:22 +0200
From:   Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To:     Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@....com>, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        mark.rutland@....com, shawnguo@...nel.org, s.hauer@...gutronix.de,
        kernel@...gutronix.de, festevam@...il.com, leonard.crestez@....com,
        ping.bai@....com, daniel.baluta@....com, jun.li@....com,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Linux-imx@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: imx8mm: Remove incorrect fallback
 compatible for ocotp

On 11/09/2019 16:24, Anson Huang wrote:
> Compared to i.MX7D, i.MX8MM has different ocotp layout, so it should
> NOT use "fsl,imx7d-ocotp" as ocotp's fallback compatible, remove it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@....com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm.dtsi | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm.dtsi
> index 5f9d0da..7c4dcce 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm.dtsi
> @@ -426,7 +426,7 @@
>  			};
>  
>  			ocotp: ocotp-ctrl@...50000 {
> -				compatible = "fsl,imx8mm-ocotp", "fsl,imx7d-ocotp", "syscon";
> +				compatible = "fsl,imx8mm-ocotp", "syscon";
>  				reg = <0x30350000 0x10000>;
>  				clocks = <&clk IMX8MM_CLK_OCOTP_ROOT>;
>  				/* For nvmem subnodes */

Why not fold the two patches?


-- 
 <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog