[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190911091728.GA10331@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 11:17:28 +0200
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: Anson Huang <anson.huang@....com>
Cc: "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
"s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
"festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@....com>,
Jacky Bai <ping.bai@....com>,
Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>, Jun Li <jun.li@....com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: imx8mm: Remove incorrect fallback
compatible for ocotp
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 09:05:49AM +0000, Anson Huang wrote:
> Hi, Daniel
>
> > On 11/09/2019 16:24, Anson Huang wrote:
> > > Compared to i.MX7D, i.MX8MM has different ocotp layout, so it should
> > > NOT use "fsl,imx7d-ocotp" as ocotp's fallback compatible, remove it.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@....com>
> > > ---
> > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm.dtsi | 2 +-
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm.dtsi
> > > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm.dtsi
> > > index 5f9d0da..7c4dcce 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm.dtsi
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm.dtsi
> > > @@ -426,7 +426,7 @@
> > > };
> > >
> > > ocotp: ocotp-ctrl@...50000 {
> > > - compatible = "fsl,imx8mm-ocotp", "fsl,imx7d-
> > ocotp", "syscon";
> > > + compatible = "fsl,imx8mm-ocotp", "syscon";
> > > reg = <0x30350000 0x10000>;
> > > clocks = <&clk IMX8MM_CLK_OCOTP_ROOT>;
> > > /* For nvmem subnodes */
> >
> > Why not fold the two patches?
>
> For i.MX8MM, it just removes the incorrect fallback compatible, for i.MX8MN, it needs
> to replace the incorrect fallback compatible in order to support SoC UID read, so I think
> this should be 2 separate patch?
Oh, yes, there is a subtle difference in the file name :) m|n. I understand
now why you splitted it.
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists