[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190911092514.GM2680@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 12:25:14 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/11] net: phylink: switch to using
fwnode_gpiod_get_index()
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 12:52:08AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Instead of fwnode_get_named_gpiod() that I plan to hide away, let's use
> the new fwnode_gpiod_get_index() that mimics gpiod_get_index(), bit
> works with arbitrary firmware node.
I'm wondering if it's possible to step forward and replace
fwnode_get_gpiod_index by gpiod_get() / gpiod_get_index() here and
in other cases in this series.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists