[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <850f227f-8448-5dfa-59c3-87de4f157551@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 12:24:10 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>, n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com
Cc: mhocko@...nel.org, mike.kravetz@...cle.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/10] mm,hwpoison: remove MF_COUNT_INCREASED
On 10.09.19 12:30, Oscar Salvador wrote:
> From: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
>
> Now there's no user of MF_COUNT_INCREASED, so we can safely remove
> it from all calling points.
>
> Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
> Signed-off-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
> ---
> include/linux/mm.h | 7 +++----
> mm/memory-failure.c | 16 +++-------------
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> index ad6766a08f9b..fb36a4165a4e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> @@ -2814,10 +2814,9 @@ void register_page_bootmem_memmap(unsigned long section_nr, struct page *map,
> unsigned long nr_pages);
>
> enum mf_flags {
> - MF_COUNT_INCREASED = 1 << 0,
> - MF_ACTION_REQUIRED = 1 << 1,
> - MF_MUST_KILL = 1 << 2,
> - MF_SOFT_OFFLINE = 1 << 3,
> + MF_ACTION_REQUIRED = 1 << 0,
> + MF_MUST_KILL = 1 << 1,
> + MF_SOFT_OFFLINE = 1 << 2,
> };
> extern int memory_failure(unsigned long pfn, int flags);
> extern void memory_failure_queue(unsigned long pfn, int flags);
> diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
> index e43b61462fd5..1be785b25324 100644
> --- a/mm/memory-failure.c
> +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
> @@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ static int memory_failure_hugetlb(unsigned long pfn, int flags)
>
> num_poisoned_pages_inc();
>
> - if (!(flags & MF_COUNT_INCREASED) && !get_hwpoison_page(p)) {
> + if (!get_hwpoison_page(p)) {
> /*
> * Check "filter hit" and "race with other subpage."
> */
> @@ -1286,7 +1286,7 @@ int memory_failure(unsigned long pfn, int flags)
> * In fact it's dangerous to directly bump up page count from 0,
> * that may make page_ref_freeze()/page_ref_unfreeze() mismatch.
> */
> - if (!(flags & MF_COUNT_INCREASED) && !get_hwpoison_page(p)) {
> + if (!get_hwpoison_page(p)) {
> if (is_free_buddy_page(p)) {
> action_result(pfn, MF_MSG_BUDDY, MF_DELAYED);
> return 0;
> @@ -1327,10 +1327,7 @@ int memory_failure(unsigned long pfn, int flags)
> shake_page(p, 0);
> /* shake_page could have turned it free. */
> if (!PageLRU(p) && is_free_buddy_page(p)) {
> - if (flags & MF_COUNT_INCREASED)
> - action_result(pfn, MF_MSG_BUDDY, MF_DELAYED);
> - else
> - action_result(pfn, MF_MSG_BUDDY_2ND, MF_DELAYED);
> + action_result(pfn, MF_MSG_BUDDY_2ND, MF_DELAYED);
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -1618,9 +1615,6 @@ static int __get_any_page(struct page *p, unsigned long pfn, int flags)
> {
> int ret;
>
> - if (flags & MF_COUNT_INCREASED)
> - return 1;
> -
> /*
> * When the target page is a free hugepage, just remove it
> * from free hugepage list.
> @@ -1890,15 +1884,11 @@ int soft_offline_page(struct page *page, int flags)
> if (is_zone_device_page(page)) {
> pr_debug_ratelimited("soft_offline: %#lx page is device page\n",
> pfn);
> - if (flags & MF_COUNT_INCREASED)
> - put_page(page);
> return -EIO;
> }
>
> if (PageHWPoison(page)) {
> pr_info("soft offline: %#lx page already poisoned\n", pfn);
> - if (flags & MF_COUNT_INCREASED)
> - put_hwpoison_page(page);
> return -EBUSY;
> }
>
>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists