linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] Documentation/process: embargoed hardware issues additions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 11 Sep 2019 12:54:50 +0100
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, corbet@....net, sashal@...nel.org,
        ben@...adent.org.uk, tglx@...utronix.de, labbott@...hat.com,
        andrew.cooper3@...rix.com, tsoni@...eaurora.org,
        keescook@...omium.org, tony.luck@...el.com,
        dan.j.williams@...el.com, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Documentation/process: embargoed hardware issues
 additions

On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 10:26:44AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> Intel will adhere to this process for future hardware embargoed
> issues.  This series contains a patch from Tony Luck with him
> volunteering to be Intel's ambassador for this process.
> 
> These are some minor improvements here to the process document.  I've
> had the pleasure of seeing some of the problems with the various
> "processes" that led to the need for this document and I think these
> tweaks will help.  This part of the series is much more of an RFC than
> the first patch, obviously.

I've applied patch 1 to the tree, thank you for that.

The other patches will take a bit more to think about, and calm down
about, before I'll respond.  Please wait until next week for that...

thanks,

greg k-h