[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJKOXPdM_A5Enmv_GOJuKLvfBBwi-z3qWiW4WG9L-dmuW9T5Wg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 14:25:49 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Cc: Maciej Falkowski <m.falkowski@...sung.com>,
"linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: arm: samsung: Convert Samsung Exynos
IOMMU H/W, System MMU to dt-schema
On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 at 13:57, Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Krzyszotf,
>
> On 2019-09-11 13:36, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 at 13:05, Maciej Falkowski <m.falkowski@...sung.com> wrote:
> >> Convert Samsung Exynos IOMMU H/W, System Memory Management Unit
> >> to newer dt-schema format.
> >>
> >> Update clock description.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Maciej Falkowski <m.falkowski@...sung.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>
> >> ---
> >> Hi Krzysztof,
> >>
> >> Thank you for feedback.
> >>
> >> v3:
> >>
> >> - remove obsolete interrupts description and
> >> set its maxItems to one. There are some incompatible
> >> files which will be fixed with another patch.
> > Driver stopped supporting two IRQ lines in commit
> > 7222e8db2d506197ee183de0f9b76b3ad97e8c18 (iommu/exynos: Fix build
> > errors). The second IRQ line in Exynos3250 DTS seems to be ignored.
> >
> > The patch now looks good to me:
> > Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
> >
> > However for some reasons you did not CC the IOMMU maintainers. Please
> > use scripts/get_maintainer.pl to get the list of folks to CC.
>
> Frankly I don't see any reason to spam IOMMU ml or maintainer with this
> discussion about dt-binding conversion. This patch will be merged via dt
> tree if I got it right.
Indeed usually subsystem maintainers are not interested in DT schema
conversion although they are mentioned as maintainers for this file so
it is nice to CC them... I would not call spamming when there is
explicit pattern for CCing.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists