[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190911144230.GB6429@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 15:42:31 +0100
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Cao jin <caoj.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/memblock: fix typo in memblock doc
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 11:08:56AM +0800, Cao jin wrote:
> elaboarte -> elaborate
> architecure -> architecture
> compltes -> completes
>
> Signed-off-by: Cao jin <caoj.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
> ---
> mm/memblock.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
> index 7d4f61ae666a..0d0f92003d18 100644
> --- a/mm/memblock.c
> +++ b/mm/memblock.c
> @@ -83,16 +83,16 @@
> * Note, that both API variants use implict assumptions about allowed
> * memory ranges and the fallback methods. Consult the documentation
> * of :c:func:`memblock_alloc_internal` and
> - * :c:func:`memblock_alloc_range_nid` functions for more elaboarte
> + * :c:func:`memblock_alloc_range_nid` functions for more elaborate
While on it, could you please replace the
:c:func:`memblock_alloc_range_nid` construct with
memblock_alloc_range_nid()?
And that would be really great to see all the :c:func:`foo` changed to
foo().
> * description.
> *
> * As the system boot progresses, the architecture specific
> * :c:func:`mem_init` function frees all the memory to the buddy page
> * allocator.
> *
> - * Unless an architecure enables %CONFIG_ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK, the
> + * Unless an architecture enables %CONFIG_ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK, the
> * memblock data structures will be discarded after the system
> - * initialization compltes.
> + * initialization completes.
> */
>
> #ifndef CONFIG_NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES
> --
> 2.21.0
>
>
>
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists