linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 0/8] stg mail -e --version=v9 \

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 11 Sep 2019 18:09:18 +0200
From:   David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To:     Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc:     "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
        Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...ux.intel.com>,
        Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>,
        virtio-dev@...ts.oasis-open.org, kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, will@...nel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
        Yang Zhang <yang.zhang.wz@...il.com>,
        Pankaj Gupta <pagupta@...hat.com>,
        Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
        Nitesh Narayan Lal <nitesh@...hat.com>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>, lcapitulino@...hat.com,
        "Wang, Wei W" <wei.w.wang@...el.com>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>, ying.huang@...el.com,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
        "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/8] stg mail -e --version=v9 \

On 11.09.19 15:51, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 11-09-19 15:20:02, Michal Hocko wrote:
> [...]
>>> 4. Continuously report, not the "one time report everything" approach.
>>
>> So you mean the allocator reporting this rather than an external code to
>> poll right? I do not know, how much this is nice to have than must have?
> 
> Another idea that I haven't really thought through so it might turned
> out to be completely bogus but let's try anyway. Your "report everything"
> just made me look and realize that free_pages_prepare already performs
> stuff that actually does something similar yet unrelated.
> 
> We do report to special page poisoning, zeroying or
> CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC to unmap the address from the kernel address
> space. This sounds like something fitting your model no?
> 

AFAIKS, the poisoning/unmapping is done whenever a page is freed. I
don't quite see yet how that would help to remember if a page was
already reported. After reporting the page we would have to switch some
state (Nitesh: bitmap bit, Alexander: page flag) to identify that.

Of course, we could map the page and treat that as "the state" when we
reported it, but I am not sure that's such a good idea :)

As always, I might be very wrong ...

-- 

Thanks,

David / dhildenb