[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190911161621.19832-15-smayhew@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 12:16:09 -0400
From: Scott Mayhew <smayhew@...hat.com>
To: anna.schumaker@...app.com, trond.myklebust@...merspace.com
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 14/26] nfs_clone_sb_security(): simplify the check for server bogosity
From: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
We used to check ->i_op for being nfs_dir_inode_operations. With
separate inode_operations for v3 and v4 that became bogus, but
rather than going for protocol-dependent comparison we could've
just checked ->i_fop instead; _that_ is the same for all protocol
versions.
Reviewed-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
---
fs/nfs/super.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfs/super.c b/fs/nfs/super.c
index 89751ce21110..6f4983fc3937 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/super.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/super.c
@@ -2569,7 +2569,7 @@ int nfs_clone_sb_security(struct super_block *s, struct dentry *mntroot,
unsigned long kflags = 0, kflags_out = 0;
/* clone any lsm security options from the parent to the new sb */
- if (d_inode(mntroot)->i_op != NFS_SB(s)->nfs_client->rpc_ops->dir_inode_ops)
+ if (d_inode(mntroot)->i_fop != &nfs_dir_operations)
return -ESTALE;
if (NFS_SB(s)->caps & NFS_CAP_SECURITY_LABEL)
--
2.17.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists