linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the pm tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3207595.z7mfiUyZYE@kreacher>
Date:   Wed, 11 Sep 2019 19:17:52 +0200
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:     Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the pm tree

On Wednesday, September 11, 2019 9:27:41 AM CEST Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 12:33:06AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > In commit
> > 
> >   fd3f7275826f ("software node: Initialize the return value in software_node_find_by_name()")
> > 
> > Fixes tag
> > 
> >   Fixes: 1666faedb567 ("software node: Add software_node_get_reference_args()")
> > 
> > has these problem(s):
> > 
> >   - Subject does not match target commit subject
> >     Just use
> > 	git log -1 --format='Fixes: %h ("%s")'
> > 
> > Did you mean
> > 
> > Fixes: 1666faedb567 ("software node: Add software_node_find_by_name()")
> > 
> > or
> > 
> > Fixes: b06184acf751 ("software node: Add software_node_get_reference_args()")
> 
> Rafael, it seems you have rebased your branch.

No, I haven't.

Actually, the commit ID is correct, but the name isn't.

You'd have been unlikely to get a valid commit ID matching anything with
"software node" in the subject had it been rebased. :-)

> Do you want me to resend those fixes, or can you fix the tags in them
> yourself?

I fixed that tag up.

Thanks,
Rafael