linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 9/9] arm64: dts: renesas: Add CMM units to Gen3 SoCs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMuHMdVfgsUVbsyH=Q9FGU_auLapUS-uTGgPDYzeX4wuXNd5cA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 11 Sep 2019 21:35:02 +0200
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:     Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@...asonboard.com>,
        Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@...ndi.org>
Cc:     Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
        Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
        Ulrich Hecht <uli+renesas@...nd.eu>,
        VenkataRajesh.Kalakodima@...bosch.com,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Koji Matsuoka <koji.matsuoka.xm@...esas.com>, muroya@....co.jp,
        Harsha.ManjulaMallikarjun@...bosch.com,
        Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        DRI Development <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 9/9] arm64: dts: renesas: Add CMM units to Gen3 SoCs

Hi Kieran, Jacopo,

On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 8:16 PM Kieran Bingham
<kieran.bingham+renesas@...asonboard.com> wrote:
> On 06/09/2019 14:54, Jacopo Mondi wrote:
> > Add CMM units to Renesas R-Car Gen3 SoC that support it, and reference them
> > from the Display Unit they are connected to.
> >
> > Sort the 'vsps' and 'renesas,cmm' entries in the DU unit consistently
> > in all the involved DTS.
>
> I think if you chose the ordering in the r8a7795, then you only have to
> adjust/correct the ordering in the r8a7796 and r8a77965 ...
>
> Especially as you haven't changed the ordering of r8a77970, and r8a77980
> which have the status after the vsps entry.
>
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@...ndi.org>

> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7795.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7795.dtsi

> > @@ -3142,9 +3178,11 @@
> >                                <&cpg CPG_MOD 722>,
> >                                <&cpg CPG_MOD 721>;
> >                       clock-names = "du.0", "du.1", "du.2", "du.3";
> > -                     vsps = <&vspd0 0>, <&vspd1 0>, <&vspd2 0>, <&vspd0 1>;
> >                       status = "disabled";
>
> I'm not sure the vsps should be below the status = disabled line.
>
> I'd have this as:
>
>         clock-names...
>         vsps...
>         renesas,cmms...
>                 <blank line>
>         status...
>                 <blank line>
>         ports...

Indeed.

And better write "ports { ... }", so it's clear this is a subnode.

>
> >
> > +                     vsps = <&vspd0 0>, <&vspd1 0>, <&vspd2 0>, <&vspd0 1>;

And the above will become "renesas,vsps", needing another reordering?

> > +                     renesas,cmms = <&cmm0 &cmm1 &cmm2 &cmm3>;
>
> I think these should be separated by comma's to show they are separate
> references, or references to separate phandles or such.

Yep, looks better, and makes the grouping clear.

> The only precedence I could find was in pmu_a53:
>
>           interrupt-affinity = <&a53_0>, <&a53_1>, <&a53_2>, <&a53_3>;

That's because most other phandle stuff has #<foo>-cells as non-zero.

We do have

    clocks = ... <&audio_clk_a>, <&audio_clk_b>, <&audio_clk_c>;

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds