linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH glibc 2.31 1/5] glibc: Perform rseq(2) registration at C startup and thread creation (v12)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4a6f6326-ea82-e031-0fe0-7263ed97e797@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 11 Sep 2019 15:45:14 -0400
From:   Carlos O'Donell <carlos@...hat.com>
To:     Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>
Cc:     Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
        Joseph Myers <joseph@...esourcery.com>,
        Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@....com>,
        libc-alpha@...rceware.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ben Maurer <bmaurer@...com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Dave Watson <davejwatson@...com>, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
        Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH glibc 2.31 1/5] glibc: Perform rseq(2) registration at C
 startup and thread creation (v12)

On 9/11/19 3:08 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Carlos O'Donell:
> 
>> It would be easier to merge the patch set if it were just an unconditional
>> registration like we do for set_robust_list().
> 
> Note that this depends on the in-tree system call numbers list, which I
> still need to finish according to Joseph's specifications.

Which work is this? Do you have a URL reference to WIP?

> (We have something that should work for us as long as we can get large
> machines from the lab, but I agree that it's not very useful if glibc
> bot-cycle time is roughly one business day.)

Yeah, we have to discuss how to accelerate this.

-- 
Cheers,
Carlos.