linux-kernel - Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH v2 3/3] libnvdimm, MAINTAINERS: Maintainer Entry Profile

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <37a9f105f85b7accb5eefe788f8d129e9fddaa2c.camel@perches.com>
Date:   Wed, 11 Sep 2019 13:30:53 -0700
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
        Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
        ksummit-discuss@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
        linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH v2 3/3] libnvdimm, MAINTAINERS:
 Maintainer Entry Profile

On Wed, 2019-09-11 at 08:48 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> Document the basic policies of the libnvdimm subsystem and provide a first
> example of a Maintainer Entry Profile for others to duplicate and edit.
[]
> +Coding Style Addendum
> +---------------------
> +libnvdimm expects multi-line statements to be double indented. I.e.
> +
> +        if (x...
> +                        && ...y) {

I don't find a good reason to do this.

> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
[]
> @@ -9185,6 +9185,7 @@ M:	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
>  M:	Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>
>  M:	Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>
>  L:	linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org
> +P:	Documentation/nvdimm/maintainer-entry-profile.rst

I also think the indirection to a separate
file is not a good thing.

Separate styles for individual subsystems is
not something I would want to encourage.