[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJfpegsorJKWoqRyThCfgLUyXiK7TLjSwmh5DqC8cytYRE4TLw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 10:14:11 +0200
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] virtio-fs: shared file system for virtual machines
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 5:54 PM Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 05:12:02PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > I've folded the series from Vivek and fixed a couple of TODO comments
> > myself. AFAICS two issues remain that need to be resolved in the short
> > term, one way or the other: freeze/restore and full virtqueue.
>
> I have researched freeze/restore and come to the conclusion that it
> needs to be a future feature. It will probably come together with live
> migration support for reasons mentioned below.
>
> Most virtio devices have fairly simply power management freeze/restore
> functions that shut down the device and bring it back to the state held
> in memory, respectively. virtio-fs, as well as virtio-9p and
> virtio-gpu, are different because they contain session state. It is not
> easily possible to bring back the state held in memory after the device
> has been reset.
>
> The following areas of the FUSE protocol are stateful and need special
> attention:
>
> * FUSE_INIT - this is pretty easy, we must re-negotiate the same
> settings as before.
>
> * FUSE_LOOKUP -> fuse_inode (inode_map)
>
> The session contains a set of inode numbers that have been looked up
> using FUSE_LOOKUP. They are ephemeral in the current virtiofsd
> implementation and vary across device reset. Therefore we are unable
> to restore the same inode numbers upon restore.
>
> The solution is persistent inode numbers in virtiofsd. This is also
> needed to make open_by_handle_at(2) work and probably for live
> migration.
>
> * FUSE_OPEN -> fh (fd_map)
>
> The session contains FUSE file handles for open files. There is
> currently no way of re-opening a file so that a specific fh is
> returned. A mechanism to do so probably isn't necessary if the
> driver can update the fh to the new one produced by the device for
> all open files instead.
>
> * FUSE_OPENDIR -> fh (dirp_map)
>
> Same story as for FUSE_OPEN but for open directories.
>
> * FUSE_GETLK/SETLK/SETLKW -> (inode->posix_locks and fcntl(F_OFD_GET/SETLK))
>
> The session contains file locks. The driver must reacquire them upon
> restore. It's unclear what to do when locking fails.
>
> Live migration has the same problem since the FUSE session will be moved
> to a new virtio-fs device instance. It makes sense to tackle both
> features together. This is something that can be implemented in the
> next year, but it's not a quick fix.
Right. The question for now is: should the freeze silently succeed
(as it seems to do now) or should it fail instead?
I guess normally freezing should be okay, as long as the virtiofsd
remains connected while the system is frozen.
I tried to test this with "echo -n mem > /sys/power/state", which
indeed resulted in the virtio_fs_freeze() callback being called.
However, I couldn't find a way to wake up the system...
Thanks,
Miklos
Powered by blists - more mailing lists