linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: work around leak of uninitialized stack contents

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 12 Sep 2019 16:56:00 +0800
From:   Fuqian Huang <huangfq.daxian@...il.com>
To:     Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
Cc:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: work around leak of uninitialized stack contents

Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com> 於 2019年9月12日週四 下午4:51寫道：
>
> Fuqian Huang <huangfq.daxian@...il.com> writes:
>
> > Emulation of VMPTRST can incorrectly inject a page fault
> > when passed an operand that points to an MMIO address.
> > The page fault will use uninitialized kernel stack memory
> > as the CR2 and error code.
> >
> > The right behavior would be to abort the VM with a KVM_EXIT_INTERNAL_ERROR
> > exit to userspace;
>
> Hm, why so? KVM_EXIT_INTERNAL_ERROR is basically an error in KVM, this
> is not a proper reaction to a userspace-induced condition (or ever).
>
> I also looked at VMPTRST's description in Intel's manual and I can't
> find and explicit limitation like "this must be normal memory". We're
> just supposed to inject #PF "If a page fault occurs in accessing the
> memory destination operand."
>
> In case it seems to be too cumbersome to handle VMPTRST to MMIO and we
> think that nobody should be doing that I'd rather prefer injecting #GP.
>
> Please tell me what I'm missing :-)

I found it during the code review, and it looks like the problem the
commit 353c0956a618 ("KVM: x86: work around leak of uninitialized
stack contents (CVE-2019-7222)")
mentions. So I fixed it in a similar way.

>
> >  however, it is not an easy fix, so for now just ensure
> > that the error code and CR2 are zero.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Fuqian Huang <huangfq.daxian@...il.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > index 290c3c3efb87..7f442d710858 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > @@ -5312,6 +5312,7 @@ int kvm_write_guest_virt_system(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t addr, void *val,
> >       /* kvm_write_guest_virt_system can pull in tons of pages. */
> >       vcpu->arch.l1tf_flush_l1d = true;
> >
> > +     memset(exception, 0, sizeof(*exception));
> >       return kvm_write_guest_virt_helper(addr, val, bytes, vcpu,
> >                                          PFERR_WRITE_MASK, exception);
> >  }
>
> --
> Vitaly