[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190912094035.vkqnj24bwh33yvia@box>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 12:40:35 +0300
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
To: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] mm: correct mask size for slub page->objects
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 08:31:08PM -0600, Yu Zhao wrote:
> Mask of slub objects per page shouldn't be larger than what
> page->objects can hold.
>
> It requires more than 2^15 objects to hit the problem, and I don't
> think anybody would. It'd be nice to have the mask fixed, but not
> really worth cc'ing the stable.
>
> Fixes: 50d5c41cd151 ("slub: Do not use frozen page flag but a bit in the page counters")
> Signed-off-by: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>
I don't think the patch fixes anything.
Yes, we have one spare bit between order and number of object that is not
used and always zero. So what?
I can imagine for some microarchitecures accessing higher 16 bits of int
is cheaper than shifting by 15.
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists