linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/11] Add support for software nodes to gpiolib

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdb=s67w2DCGubhbLQTtxpWtiW8S1MECMO4cvec=bF6OdA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 12 Sep 2019 10:55:47 +0100
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>,
        Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
        Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
        Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        "open list:DRM PANEL DRIVERS" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] Add support for software nodes to gpiolib

On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 8:52 AM Dmitry Torokhov
<dmitry.torokhov@...il.com> wrote:

> If we agree in principle, I would like to have the very first 3 patches
> in an immutable branch off maybe -rc8 so that it can be pulled into
> individual subsystems so that patches switching various drivers to
> fwnode_gpiod_get_index() could be applied.

I think it seems a bit enthusiastic to have non-GPIO subsystems
pick up these changes this close to the merge window so my plan
is to merge patches 1.2.3 (1 already merged) and then you could
massage the other subsystems in v5.4-rc1.

But if other subsystems say "hey we want do fix this in like 3 days"
then I'm game for an immutable branch as well.

Yours,
Linus Walleij