lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wjKv_Zw2zGHduyrQH_VQzxXYzwKdwwzzpsdnsdx=EK30Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 12 Sep 2019 12:59:25 +0100
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Martin Wilck <Martin.Wilck@...e.com>
Cc:     "chris@...is-wilson.co.uk" <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
        Michal Koutny <MKoutny@...e.com>,
        "intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org" <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        "leho@...av.com" <leho@...av.com>, "tiwai@...e.de" <tiwai@...e.de>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 5.3-rc3: Frozen graphics with kcompactd migrating i915 pages

On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 12:51 PM Martin Wilck <Martin.Wilck@...e.com> wrote:
>
> Is there an alternative to reverting aa56a292ce62 ("drm/i915/userptr:
> Acquire the page lock around set_page_dirty()")? And if we do, what
> would be the consequences? Would other patches need to be reverted,
> too?

Looking at that commit, and the backtrace of the lockup, I think that
reverting it is the correct thing to do.

You can't take the page lock in invalidate_range(), since it's called
from try_to_unmap(), which is called with the page lock already held.

So commit aa56a292ce62 is just fundamentally completely wrong and
should be reverted.

               Linus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ