lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 12 Sep 2019 15:56:08 +0300
From:   Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@...aro.org>
To:     Pradeep P V K <ppvk@...eaurora.org>, adrian.hunter@...el.com,
        ulf.hansson@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org
Cc:     asutoshd@...eaurora.org, vbadigan@...eaurora.org,
        stummala@...eaurora.org, sayalil@...eaurora.org,
        rampraka@...eaurora.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@...eaurora.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/2] mmc: sdhci-msm: Add support for bus bandwidth voting

Hi Pradeep,

Thanks for the patch!

On 9/6/19 15:47, Pradeep P V K wrote:
> Vote for the MSM bus bandwidth required by SDHC driver
> based on the clock frequency and bus width of the card.
> Otherwise,the system clocks may run at minimum clock speed
> and thus affecting the performance.
> 
> This change is based on Georgi Djakov [RFC]
> (https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/10/11/499)

I am just wondering whether do we really need to predefine the bandwidth values
in DT? Can't we use the computations from the above patch or is there any
problem with that approach?

Thanks,
Georgi

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ