[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190912130007.4469-3-bparrot@ti.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 08:00:03 -0500
From: Benoit Parrot <bparrot@...com>
To: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
CC: Prabhakar Lad <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>,
<linux-media@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Benoit Parrot <bparrot@...com>,
Jyri Sarha <jsarha@...com>
Subject: [Patch 2/6] media: i2c: ov2659: Fix sensor detection to actually fail when device is not present
Make sure that if the expected sensor device id register
is not recognized properly the failure is propagated
up so devices are not left partially initialized.
Signed-off-by: Benoit Parrot <bparrot@...com>
Signed-off-by: Jyri Sarha <jsarha@...com>
---
drivers/media/i2c/ov2659.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/ov2659.c b/drivers/media/i2c/ov2659.c
index 17573257097d..efbe6dc720e2 100644
--- a/drivers/media/i2c/ov2659.c
+++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ov2659.c
@@ -1330,11 +1330,12 @@ static int ov2659_detect(struct v4l2_subdev *sd)
unsigned short id;
id = OV265X_ID(pid, ver);
- if (id != OV2659_ID)
+ if (id != OV2659_ID) {
dev_err(&client->dev,
"Sensor detection failed (%04X, %d)\n",
id, ret);
- else {
+ ret = -ENODEV;
+ } else {
dev_info(&client->dev, "Found OV%04X sensor\n", id);
ret = ov2659_init(sd, 0);
}
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists