[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <79fede05-735b-8477-c273-f34db93fd72b@virtuozzo.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 20:05:14 +0300
From: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Walter Wu <walter-zh.wu@...iatek.com>
Cc: Qian Cai <cai@....pw>, Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kasan-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, wsd_upstream@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mm/kasan: dump alloc and free stack for page allocator
On 9/12/19 5:31 PM, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 9/12/19 4:08 PM, Walter Wu wrote:
>>
>>> extern void __reset_page_owner(struct page *page, unsigned int order);
>>> diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.kasan b/lib/Kconfig.kasan
>>> index 6c9682ce0254..dc560c7562e8 100644
>>> --- a/lib/Kconfig.kasan
>>> +++ b/lib/Kconfig.kasan
>>> @@ -41,6 +41,8 @@ config KASAN_GENERIC
>>> select SLUB_DEBUG if SLUB
>>> select CONSTRUCTORS
>>> select STACKDEPOT
>>> + select PAGE_OWNER
>>> + select PAGE_OWNER_FREE_STACK
>>> help
>>> Enables generic KASAN mode.
>>> Supported in both GCC and Clang. With GCC it requires version 4.9.2
>>> @@ -63,6 +65,8 @@ config KASAN_SW_TAGS
>>> select SLUB_DEBUG if SLUB
>>> select CONSTRUCTORS
>>> select STACKDEPOT
>>> + select PAGE_OWNER
>>> + select PAGE_OWNER_FREE_STACK
>>> help
>>
>> What is the difference between PAGE_OWNER+PAGE_OWNER_FREE_STACK and
>> DEBUG_PAGEALLOC?
>
> Same memory usage, but debug_pagealloc means also extra checks and restricting memory access to freed pages to catch UAF.
>
>> If you directly enable PAGE_OWNER+PAGE_OWNER_FREE_STACK
>> PAGE_OWNER_FREE_STACK,don't you think low-memory device to want to use
>> KASAN?
>
> OK, so it should be optional? But I think it's enough to distinguish no PAGE_OWNER at all, and PAGE_OWNER+PAGE_OWNER_FREE_STACK together - I don't see much point in PAGE_OWNER only for this kind of debugging.
>
> So how about this? KASAN wouldn't select PAGE_OWNER* but it would be recommended in the help+docs. When PAGE_OWNER and KASAN are selected by user, PAGE_OWNER_FREE_STACK gets also selected, and both will be also runtime enabled without explicit page_owner=on.
> I mostly want to avoid another boot-time option for enabling PAGE_OWNER_FREE_STACK.
> Would that be enough flexibility for low-memory devices vs full-fledged debugging?
Originally I thought that with you patch users still can disable page_owner via "page_owner=off" boot param.
But now I realized that this won't work. I think it should work, we should allow users to disable it.
Or another alternative option (and actually easier one to implement), leave PAGE_OWNER as is (no "select"s in Kconfigs)
Make PAGE_OWNER_FREE_STACK like this:
+config PAGE_OWNER_FREE_STACK
+ def_bool KASAN || DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
+ depends on PAGE_OWNER
+
So, users that want alloc/free stack will have to enable CONFIG_PAGE_OWNER=y and add page_owner=on to boot cmdline.
Basically the difference between these alternative is whether we enable page_owner by default or not. But there is always a possibility to disable it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists