linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/9] dt-bindings: crypto: Add DT bindings documentation for sun8i-ce Crypto Engine

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGb2v646YkM93BAo=hrpL+tgDU-JJ49-uMCMGECUbouoJrpg=w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 12 Sep 2019 21:37:17 +0100
From:   Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
To:     Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>
Cc:     Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@...il.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] dt-bindings: crypto: Add DT bindings documentation
 for sun8i-ce Crypto Engine

On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 9:33 PM Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 09:26:27PM +0100, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> > > >
> > > >   clock-names:
> > > >     items:
> > > >       - const: ahb
> > > >       - const: mod
> > > >       - const: mbus
> > >
> > > And here as well
> > >
> > > Something I missed earlier though was that we've tried to unify as
> > > much as possible the ahb / apb / axi clocks around the bus name, it
> > > would be great if you could do it.
> >
> > I think we also want to standardize "mbus" as "dram"?
>
> Do we? The only user so far seems to be sun9i-de, while mbus has more
> users. I don't really care though, both mbus and dram are pretty
> generic to me. What makes you prefer dram over mbus?

Argh... it's actually "ram" we use the most. Both "dram" and "mbus"
have only one instance each.

ChenYu