[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4df0a07ec8f1391acfa987ecef184a50e7831000.camel@perches.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 14:08:16 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>,
Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] nvdimm: Use more common kernel coding style
On Thu, 2019-09-12 at 16:21 +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> As soon as you get accustomed to have formatting done and enforced
> automatically, it is great. Other major projects have done so for
> quite a while now.
Please name the major projects and then point to their
.clang-format equivalents.
Also note the size/scope/complexity of the major projects.
thanks.
> If doesn't think it is good enough, please let us know and, if it is
> close enough, we can look at going for a newer LLVM to match the style
> a bit more.
I used the latest one, and quite a bit of the conversion
was unpleasant to read.
> Also note that one can disable formatting for some
> sections of code if really needed.
Marking sections _no_auto_format_ isn't really a
good solution is it?
.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists