lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ed9803592b2cbc96e2b422df68cbd62d8daf6f76.camel@perches.com>
Date:   Thu, 12 Sep 2019 16:07:53 -0700
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Cc:     Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>,
        Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] nvdimm: Use more common kernel coding style

On Thu, 2019-09-12 at 16:00 -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:

> Consider the fact that not all kernel developers run checkpatch.pl.
> Is that a deficiency in checkpatch.pl, or the lack of enforcement in
> kernel developers' workflows?

No.  Mostly it's because the kernel is like a bunch of little
untethered development planets, each with a little prince that
wants to keep their own little fiefdom separate from the others.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ