lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190912235103.GD24937@Asurada-Nvidia.nvidia.com>
Date:   Thu, 12 Sep 2019 16:51:03 -0700
From:   Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>
To:     "S.j. Wang" <shengjiu.wang@....com>
Cc:     "timur@...nel.org" <timur@...nel.org>,
        "Xiubo.Lee@...il.com" <Xiubo.Lee@...il.com>,
        "festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
        "lgirdwood@...il.com" <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        "broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>,
        "perex@...ex.cz" <perex@...ex.cz>,
        "tiwai@...e.com" <tiwai@...e.com>,
        "alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
        "linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ASoC: fsl_asrc: update supported sample format

On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 02:07:25AM +0000, S.j. Wang wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 06:33:20PM -0400, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
> > > The ASRC support 24bit/16bit/8bit input width, so S20_3LE format
> > > should not be supported, it is word width is 20bit.
> > 
> > I thought 3LE used 24-bit physical width. And the driver assigns
> > ASRC_WIDTH_24_BIT to "width" for all non-16bit cases, so 20-bit would go
> > for that 24-bit slot also. I don't clearly recall if I had explicitly tested
> > S20_3LE, but I feel it should work since I put there...
> 
> For S20_3LE, the width is 20bit,  but the ASRC only support 24bit, if set the
> ASRMCR1n.IWD= 24bit, because the actual width is 20 bit, the volume is
> Lower than expected,  it likes 24bit data right shift 4 bit.
> So it is not supported.

Hmm..S20_3LE right-aligns 20 bits in a 24-bit slot? I thought
they're left aligned...

If this is the case...shouldn't we have the same lower-volume
problem for all hardwares that support S20_3LE now?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ