linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the configfs tree with the vfs-fixes tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190913215807.GP1131@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date:   Fri, 13 Sep 2019 22:58:07 +0100
From:   Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the configfs tree with the vfs-fixes
 tree

On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 03:47:16PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 11:44:12PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > Today's linux-next merge of the configfs tree got a conflict in:
> > 
> >   fs/configfs/symlink.c
> > 
> > between commit:
> > 
> >   e272d4fb74d6 ("configfs: fix a deadlock in configfs_symlink()")
> > 
> > from the vfs-fixes tree and commit:
> 
> The configfs one has been rebased.  I also have another refactoring
> after this one before the rest of Als patches, so you'll run into
> more issues.
> 
> Al, can you drop the branch from your tree?

Done.