[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABCJKudjb7FzsM1iXukOqgcXuC31YkH1inBmFME5msbZ=jh4+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 16:28:43 -0700
From: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] x86: fix function types in COND_SYSCALL
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 3:46 PM Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org> wrote:
> Didn't you just fix the type of sys_ni_syscall? What am I missing here?
The other patch fixes indirect call type mismatches when the function
is called through the syscall table. However, cond_syscall creates an
alias to the actual sys_ni_syscall function defined in
kernel/sys_ni.c, which still has the wrong type.
Sami
Powered by blists - more mailing lists