lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190913081807.GB27291@lahna.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 13 Sep 2019 11:18:07 +0300
From:   Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:     Rahul Tanwar <rahul.tanwar@...ux.intel.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Andriy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>,
        qi-ming.wu@...el.com, yixin.zhu@...ux.intel.com,
        cheol.yong.kim@...el.com,
        Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>,
        Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] pinctrl: Add new pinctrl/GPIO driver

On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 11:11:32AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> Hi Rahul,
> 
> thanks for your patches!
> 
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 8:59 AM Rahul Tanwar
> <rahul.tanwar@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > This series is to add pinctrl & GPIO controller driver for a new SoC.
> > Patch 1 adds pinmux & GPIO controller driver.
> > Patch 2 adds the dt bindings document & include file.
> >
> > Patches are against Linux 5.3-rc5 at below Git tree:
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-pinctrl.git
> 
> OK nice, I think you need to include Mika Westerberg on this review
> as well, because I think he likes to stay on top of all things intel
> in pin control. (Also included two other Intel folks in Finland who usually
> take an interest in these things.)

Thanks Linus for looping me in.

Even if this is not directly based on the stuff we have under
drivers/pinctrl/intel/*, I have a couple of comments. I don't have this
patch series in my inbox so I'm commenting here.

Since the driver name is equilibrium I suggest you to name
intel_pinctrl_driver and the like (probe, remove) to follow that
convention to avoid confusing this with the Intel pinctrl drivers under
drivers/pinctrl/intel/*.

Maybe use eqbr prefix so then intel_pinctrl_driver becomes
eqbr_pinctrl_driver and so on. Also all the structures like
intel_pinctrl_drv_data should be changed accordingly.

Ditto for:

MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Intel Pinctrl Driver for LGM SoC");

I think better would be:

MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Pinctrl Driver for LGM SoC (Equilibrium)");

Anyway you get the idea :)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ