[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190913114550.956-2-alexandru.ardelean@analog.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 14:45:36 +0300
From: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@...log.com>
To: <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>
CC: <jic23@...nel.org>, <broonie@...nel.org>, <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
<linus.walleij@...aro.org>, <orsonzhai@...il.com>,
<baolin.wang@...aro.org>, <zhang.lyra@...il.com>,
Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@...log.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 01/15] spi: move `cs_change_delay` backwards compat logic outside switch
The `cs_change_delay` backwards compatibility value could be moved outside
of the switch statement.
The only reason to do it, is to make the next patches easier to diff.
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@...log.com>
---
drivers/spi/spi.c | 11 +++++------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi.c b/drivers/spi/spi.c
index 75ac046cae52..c90e02e6d62f 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi.c
@@ -1114,16 +1114,15 @@ static void _spi_transfer_cs_change_delay(struct spi_message *msg,
u32 hz;
/* return early on "fast" mode - for everything but USECS */
- if (!delay && unit != SPI_DELAY_UNIT_USECS)
+ if (!delay) {
+ if (unit == SPI_DELAY_UNIT_USECS)
+ _spi_transfer_delay_ns(10000);
return;
+ }
switch (unit) {
case SPI_DELAY_UNIT_USECS:
- /* for compatibility use default of 10us */
- if (!delay)
- delay = 10000;
- else
- delay *= 1000;
+ delay *= 1000;
break;
case SPI_DELAY_UNIT_NSECS: /* nothing to do here */
break;
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists