linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] RDMA/bnxt_re: fix spelling mistake "missin_resp" -> "missing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+sbYW1MWTBa-yG+Z2Z5KwZGfwRTOdLpzL64fE35OEeGrPbgeQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 13 Sep 2019 15:25:45 +0530
From:   Selvin Xavier <selvin.xavier@...adcom.com>
To:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>
Cc:     Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
        Devesh Sharma <devesh.sharma@...adcom.com>,
        Somnath Kotur <somnath.kotur@...adcom.com>,
        Sriharsha Basavapatna <sriharsha.basavapatna@...adcom.com>,
        Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
        "linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
        "kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org" <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RDMA/bnxt_re: fix spelling mistake "missin_resp" -> "missing_resp"

On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 8:40 PM Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 10:28:56AM +0100, Colin King wrote:
> > From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> >
> > There is a spelling mistake in a literal string, fix it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/hw_counters.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/hw_counters.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/hw_counters.c
> > index 604b71875f5f..3421a0b15983 100644
> > --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/hw_counters.c
> > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/hw_counters.c
> > @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ static const char * const bnxt_re_stat_name[] = {
> >       [BNXT_RE_SEQ_ERR_NAKS_RCVD]     = "seq_err_naks_rcvd",
> >       [BNXT_RE_MAX_RETRY_EXCEEDED]    = "max_retry_exceeded",
> >       [BNXT_RE_RNR_NAKS_RCVD]         = "rnr_naks_rcvd",
> > -     [BNXT_RE_MISSING_RESP]          = "missin_resp",
> > +     [BNXT_RE_MISSING_RESP]          = "missing_resp",
>
> Broadcom folks, can you confirm if this is OK? Is the string ABI for
> this driver?
>

 bnxt_re doesn't have a string ABI.
This is a spelling mistake while posting the patch and it is okay to
merge this patch.

Thanks
Acked-by: Selvin Xavier <selvin.xavier@...adcom.com>