[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190913130428.110822953@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 14:06:53 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
syzbot+0bf0519d6e0de15914fe@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Zubin Mithra <zsm@...omium.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 3/9] xfrm: clean up xfrm protocol checks
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
commit dbb2483b2a46fbaf833cfb5deb5ed9cace9c7399 upstream.
In commit 6a53b7593233 ("xfrm: check id proto in validate_tmpl()")
I introduced a check for xfrm protocol, but according to Herbert
IPSEC_PROTO_ANY should only be used as a wildcard for lookup, so
it should be removed from validate_tmpl().
And, IPSEC_PROTO_ANY is expected to only match 3 IPSec-specific
protocols, this is why xfrm_state_flush() could still miss
IPPROTO_ROUTING, which leads that those entries are left in
net->xfrm.state_all before exit net. Fix this by replacing
IPSEC_PROTO_ANY with zero.
This patch also extracts the check from validate_tmpl() to
xfrm_id_proto_valid() and uses it in parse_ipsecrequest().
With this, no other protocols should be added into xfrm.
Fixes: 6a53b7593233 ("xfrm: check id proto in validate_tmpl()")
Reported-by: syzbot+0bf0519d6e0de15914fe@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Cc: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Acked-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
Signed-off-by: Zubin Mithra <zsm@...omium.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
include/net/xfrm.h | 17 +++++++++++++++++
net/key/af_key.c | 4 +++-
net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c | 2 +-
net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c | 14 +-------------
4 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
--- a/include/net/xfrm.h
+++ b/include/net/xfrm.h
@@ -1301,6 +1301,23 @@ static inline int xfrm_state_kern(const
return atomic_read(&x->tunnel_users);
}
+static inline bool xfrm_id_proto_valid(u8 proto)
+{
+ switch (proto) {
+ case IPPROTO_AH:
+ case IPPROTO_ESP:
+ case IPPROTO_COMP:
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
+ case IPPROTO_ROUTING:
+ case IPPROTO_DSTOPTS:
+#endif
+ return true;
+ default:
+ return false;
+ }
+}
+
+/* IPSEC_PROTO_ANY only matches 3 IPsec protocols, 0 could match all. */
static inline int xfrm_id_proto_match(u8 proto, u8 userproto)
{
return (!userproto || proto == userproto ||
--- a/net/key/af_key.c
+++ b/net/key/af_key.c
@@ -1969,8 +1969,10 @@ parse_ipsecrequest(struct xfrm_policy *x
if (rq->sadb_x_ipsecrequest_mode == 0)
return -EINVAL;
+ if (!xfrm_id_proto_valid(rq->sadb_x_ipsecrequest_proto))
+ return -EINVAL;
- t->id.proto = rq->sadb_x_ipsecrequest_proto; /* XXX check proto */
+ t->id.proto = rq->sadb_x_ipsecrequest_proto;
if ((mode = pfkey_mode_to_xfrm(rq->sadb_x_ipsecrequest_mode)) < 0)
return -EINVAL;
t->mode = mode;
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
@@ -2133,7 +2133,7 @@ void xfrm_state_fini(struct net *net)
unsigned int sz;
flush_work(&net->xfrm.state_hash_work);
- xfrm_state_flush(net, IPSEC_PROTO_ANY, false);
+ xfrm_state_flush(net, 0, false);
flush_work(&net->xfrm.state_gc_work);
WARN_ON(!list_empty(&net->xfrm.state_all));
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
@@ -1448,20 +1448,8 @@ static int validate_tmpl(int nr, struct
return -EINVAL;
}
- switch (ut[i].id.proto) {
- case IPPROTO_AH:
- case IPPROTO_ESP:
- case IPPROTO_COMP:
-#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
- case IPPROTO_ROUTING:
- case IPPROTO_DSTOPTS:
-#endif
- case IPSEC_PROTO_ANY:
- break;
- default:
+ if (!xfrm_id_proto_valid(ut[i].id.proto))
return -EINVAL;
- }
-
}
return 0;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists